Did Jesus Rise on Easter? Decoding the Resurrection Story.

Did Jesus rise from the dead on Easter Sunday? That’s the million-dollar question, right? Forget boring history lessons – we’re diving headfirst into the ultimate comeback story. This isn’t just some dusty old tale; it’s a wild ride through ancient Judea, packed with drama, betrayal, and a whole lotta hope. Get ready to unpack the gospels, bust some myths, and maybe even question everything you thought you knew about the ultimate Easter egg hunt: the resurrection!

We’re gonna break down the biblical accounts, from the nail-biting crucifixion to the shock of the empty tomb. We’ll compare the Gospels like they’re rival reality shows, highlighting the juicy bits and the discrepancies. Plus, we’ll peek into the historical context – think Roman rulers, Passover parties, and the buzz around Jesus’ ministry. Get ready for evidence, arguments, and a whole lotta theological head-scratching as we explore the resurrection’s impact on faith and culture.

Buckle up, buttercups, it’s gonna be a wild ride!

Biblical Accounts of the Resurrection

The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the cornerstone of Christian faith, a pivotal event that transformed despair into hope and death into life. The Gospels, the primary sources for understanding Jesus’ life and teachings, each offer unique perspectives on this miraculous event. While sharing a common core narrative, they also present distinct details, enriching our understanding of the resurrection and its significance.

Key Passages in the Gospels Describing the Resurrection

Each Gospel writer – Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John – recounts the resurrection with their own emphasis and details, contributing to a fuller picture of this pivotal moment.* Matthew: Matthew’s Gospel emphasizes the role of angels, the earthquake, and the appearances of the resurrected Jesus, particularly in Galilee. He highlights the commission given to the disciples to make disciples of all nations.

Key passages include Matthew 28:1-20.

Mark

Mark’s account is the shortest and focuses on the empty tomb and the message delivered by the angel. He emphasizes the initial fear and silence of the women. The longer ending of Mark (Mark 16:9-20) includes further appearances. Key passages include Mark 16:1-8 (and potentially 16:9-20).

Luke

Luke’s Gospel provides more details about the journey to Emmaus and the subsequent appearances of Jesus to his disciples. It highlights the importance of understanding the scriptures in light of the resurrection. Key passages include Luke 24:1-53.

John

John’s Gospel offers a more intimate portrayal of the resurrection, including the appearance of Jesus to Mary Magdalene and the encounter with Thomas. It emphasizes the role of faith and belief. Key passages include John 20:1-29.

Summary of Events from Crucifixion to the Empty Tomb

The events leading up to the discovery of the empty tomb are marked by grief, fear, and ultimately, the dawning of hope.* Crucifixion: Jesus is crucified on a Friday, suffering a painful death. His body is taken down from the cross and placed in a tomb.

Burial

Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Sanhedrin, provides the tomb for Jesus’ burial. The tomb is sealed with a large stone.

Sabbath

The disciples mourn, observing the Sabbath as they await the events to unfold.

Sunday Morning

Mary Magdalene and other women go to the tomb, finding the stone rolled away and the tomb empty. Angels announce that Jesus has risen.

Comparison of Resurrection Accounts in the Gospels

The following table summarizes the similarities and differences in the Gospel accounts of the resurrection.

Witnesses Mentioned in the Gospels Who Saw the Resurrected Jesus

The appearances of Jesus after his resurrection are documented, with several individuals and groups bearing witness to this extraordinary event.* Mary Magdalene: She was the first to see the resurrected Jesus (John 20:11-18). She initially mistook him for the gardener. Jesus called her by name, and she recognized him.

Other Women

The Gospels of Matthew and Luke mention other women who were present at the tomb and also encountered the risen Jesus (Matthew 28:9-10, Luke 24:1-10). They were sent to tell the disciples.

The Disciples on the Road to Emmaus

Two disciples, Cleopas and another whose name is not given, encountered Jesus on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35). They walked and talked with him without recognizing him until he broke bread with them.

Simon Peter

Peter was one of the first to see the resurrected Jesus (Luke 24:34, 1 Corinthians 15:5). This encounter is mentioned in several accounts.

Duh, soal Yesus bangkit pas Minggu Paskah mah emang bikin penasaran, ye kan? Nah, sebelum itu, ade tuh namanya Minggu Palma, hari dimana orang nyambut Yesus. Kalo mau tau lebih dalem soal palm sunday meaning , baca aje. Tapi intinya sih, biar gimana juga, Yesus tetep bangkit dari kubur pas Minggu Paskah, bener gak?

The Eleven Disciples (excluding Judas)

The Gospels record several appearances of Jesus to the remaining eleven disciples (Matthew 28:16-20, Luke 24:36-49, John 20:19-29). He showed them his wounds and commissioned them to preach the Gospel.

Thomas (Doubting Thomas)

Thomas, one of the twelve, was initially skeptical of the resurrection accounts. He was later given the opportunity to see and touch Jesus’ wounds, leading to his confession of faith (John 20:24-29).

The Disciples in Galilee

Matthew mentions that Jesus appeared to the disciples in Galilee, where they had been instructed to go (Matthew 28:16-20).

James

The Apostle Paul, in his letter to the Corinthians, mentions that Jesus appeared to James (1 Corinthians 15:7).

More than 500 Brothers at Once

The Apostle Paul also states that Jesus appeared to more than 500 brothers at once (1 Corinthians 15:6). This is a testament to the widespread belief and witness of the resurrection.

Paul (Saul of Tarsus)

Paul, the author of several New Testament books, experienced a vision of the resurrected Jesus on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:3-6). This event led to his conversion and ministry.

Historical Context of Easter Sunday

My dearest friends, as we continue our journey of discovery, let’s transport ourselves back in time, to the vibrant and often tumultuous world of first-century Judea. Understanding the historical and cultural backdrop is absolutely essential to truly appreciate the significance of Easter Sunday and the extraordinary events that unfolded. Prepare to be captivated by the intricate tapestry of events that shaped this pivotal moment in history.

First-Century Judea

Imagine a land teeming with diverse cultures, political tensions, and religious fervor. This was Judea during the time of Jesus. It was a region under Roman rule, a fact that profoundly influenced the lives of its inhabitants. The Roman Empire, with its vast military might and sophisticated administrative systems, exerted its control over Judea, leading to both periods of relative peace and simmering resentment.

This era was marked by a complex interplay of religious beliefs, social customs, and political aspirations, all of which played a crucial role in the events leading up to Easter Sunday.

Passover’s Significance

Passover, a deeply significant Jewish festival, was at the heart of the events surrounding Easter Sunday. It commemorated the Exodus, the liberation of the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. This annual celebration brought vast numbers of people to Jerusalem, creating a vibrant atmosphere but also increasing the potential for unrest. The city would swell with pilgrims, all eager to celebrate their freedom and heritage.

This influx of people created a dynamic and charged environment, making it a perfect stage for significant events.

Timeline of Events Leading to Easter Sunday

Let us embark on a journey through the final days of Jesus’ life, following a chronological sequence of events:The Last Supper: A pivotal moment of fellowship and foreshadowing. Jesus shared a final meal with his disciples, instituting the Eucharist.

“And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.'”

Luke 22

19

The Crucifixion: Jesus’ public execution by the Romans. This event, which took place on a Friday, marked the apparent end of his earthly ministry.The Burial: Jesus was laid in a tomb, sealed with a large stone. This tomb, carefully guarded, was meant to ensure his body remained.The Resurrection: On the first day of the week, Sunday, Jesus rose from the dead.

Jadi gini, pas Minggu Paskah, katanya Yesus bangkit lagi, ye kan? Nah, kalo urusan liburan, jangan lupa siapin perut buat makan kalkun pas Thanksgiving 2026, cek aja jadwalnya di thanksgiving 2026 calendar biar gak ketinggalan. Abis itu, inget lagi deh, beneran gak tuh Yesus bangkit dari kubur? Mikir keras dah!

This is the central event of Easter, the ultimate triumph over death.

The Role of Roman Authorities

The Roman authorities played a crucial role in the events surrounding Jesus’ death and resurrection. Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea, held ultimate authority. He was responsible for maintaining order and suppressing any potential rebellions. Jesus’ ministry and growing popularity, especially during the Passover celebrations, posed a threat to Roman control. The crucifixion was a brutal form of execution reserved for those deemed a threat to Roman authority.

The Romans, in their role as enforcers, ultimately facilitated the events that led to the resurrection.

Evidence Supporting the Resurrection

The claim that Jesus rose from the dead on Easter Sunday is a cornerstone of Christian faith. This belief is supported by a variety of evidence, primarily drawn from the New Testament accounts, which have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate over centuries. While differing interpretations exist, the following arguments are frequently cited as supporting the resurrection narrative.

The Empty Tomb

The discovery of an empty tomb is a central piece of evidence. The Gospel accounts consistently report that the tomb where Jesus was buried was found empty shortly after his crucifixion. This fact is significant because it challenges alternative explanations for the events surrounding Jesus’ death.The significance of the empty tomb is multifaceted:* The empty tomb implies a supernatural event, as the body was not recovered.

• It provides a physical piece of evidence that the disciples could point to.
• It undermines the possibility that Jesus’ followers fabricated the story of the resurrection, as they would have had to produce a body, which was demonstrably absent.

Appearances of Jesus After His Death, Did jesus rise from the dead on easter sunday

The New Testament details multiple appearances of Jesus to his followers after his crucifixion. These appearances are presented as transformative events, solidifying their belief in the resurrection.These appearances are detailed across the Gospels and in the writings of the Apostle Paul, with common themes emerging:* Jesus appeared to various individuals and groups, including Mary Magdalene, the disciples, and, according to Paul, over 500 people at once.

• The appearances were not fleeting visions but involved physical interaction, such as eating with the disciples and allowing them to touch his wounds.
• These appearances were often accompanied by teachings and instructions, reinforcing Jesus’ message and commissioning his followers to spread the gospel.

The accounts emphasize that these appearances were not mere hallucinations, but tangible encounters with a resurrected Jesus.

Common Counterarguments and Responses

Several counterarguments are commonly raised against the resurrection claim. Examining these, alongside their responses, provides further insight into the complexities of the debate.Here are some common counterarguments and their corresponding responses:* The Swoon Theory: This theory suggests that Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely fainted. He was then revived in the tomb, and his subsequent appearances were misinterpreted as resurrection.

Response

The Roman soldiers were skilled at execution, and the circumstances of Jesus’ death, including the spear thrust into his side, make it highly unlikely that he survived. The physical condition of someone who had endured crucifixion would have been too weak to overcome the tomb’s conditions and convince his followers he had risen.* The Conspiracy Theory: This theory proposes that the disciples stole Jesus’ body and fabricated the resurrection story.

Response

This theory struggles to explain the radical transformation of the disciples, who went from being fearful and despondent to boldly proclaiming the resurrection, often facing persecution and death for their beliefs. It also fails to account for the empty tomb, as a conspiracy would require a body to be moved, creating a tangible trail that could be disproven.* The Hallucination Theory: This theory suggests that the appearances of Jesus were mass hallucinations experienced by his followers, fueled by grief and longing.

Response

Hallucinations are typically individual experiences, not shared by multiple people simultaneously, as the Gospel accounts describe. The variety of locations and individuals involved in the appearances also makes a mass hallucination less plausible. Furthermore, the appearances included physical interactions, such as eating and touching, which are not typical of hallucinations.* The Wrong Tomb Theory: This theory suggests that the women who went to the tomb on Sunday morning went to the wrong tomb.

Response

This theory does not explain the subsequent appearances of Jesus to various people in different locations. Furthermore, the empty tomb was not only reported by the women, but also investigated by the disciples, confirming its emptiness.

Theological Interpretations of the Resurrection

The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the cornerstone of Christian theology, representing a pivotal event that fundamentally reshaped the understanding of life, death, and the relationship between God and humanity. Its significance extends far beyond a historical event, providing the foundation for Christian faith, hope, and the promise of eternal life. Let’s explore the profound theological implications of this miraculous event.

The Significance of the Resurrection for Christian Faith

The resurrection is the central tenet of Christian belief. Without it, the entire Christian faith collapses. It validates Jesus’ claims of divinity and confirms his role as the Messiah. It transforms a tragic execution into a triumphant victory, illustrating God’s power over death and the fulfillment of divine promises.The Apostle Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:14, clearly articulates the significance:

“And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.”

This highlights the critical importance of the resurrection to the Christian faith.

The Resurrection as Victory Over Death and Sin

The resurrection is understood as a decisive victory over both death and sin, two of humanity’s greatest enemies. Through his death and resurrection, Jesus conquered the power of sin, offering forgiveness and reconciliation with God. The resurrection demonstrates that death no longer holds dominion over those who believe in Christ.This victory has profound implications for believers:

• Overcoming Death: The resurrection promises eternal life to those who trust in Jesus. Death is no longer the final word but a transition to a new, glorified existence.
• Overcoming Sin: The resurrection signifies the power of Christ to break the chains of sin. Believers are empowered by the Holy Spirit to live a life of righteousness and freedom from sin’s control.
• New Creation: The resurrection inaugurates a new creation, where sin and death will ultimately be eradicated, and God’s reign will be fully realized.

The Resurrection as the Foundation of Christian Hope and Salvation

The resurrection is the bedrock of Christian hope and the pathway to salvation. It offers believers assurance of a future resurrection and a restored relationship with God. This hope provides strength and comfort in the face of suffering and adversity.The concept of salvation, understood as deliverance from sin and its consequences, is intrinsically linked to the resurrection.

• Justification: Through faith in Jesus’ death and resurrection, believers are declared righteous in God’s eyes, receiving forgiveness for their sins.
• Sanctification: The Holy Spirit, empowered by the resurrection, enables believers to grow in holiness and become more like Christ.
• Glorification: At the resurrection of the dead, believers will receive glorified bodies and enter into eternal life with God.

The promise of eternal life, stemming from the resurrection, provides a powerful motivation for living a life of faith and obedience.

The Resurrection and the Promise of Eternal Life

The resurrection guarantees eternal life for those who believe in Jesus. This promise is a central theme in Christian theology, offering comfort, hope, and a future filled with joy and fellowship with God.The concept of eternal life, as a result of the resurrection, is often illustrated in the following ways:

• Resurrection of the Body: The resurrection promises a transformed, glorified body, free from the limitations of the present life. This ensures continuity of identity and experience.
• Eternal Fellowship with God: Eternal life involves an intimate relationship with God, experiencing his love, grace, and presence forever.
• A New Heaven and a New Earth: The Bible describes a future where sin and suffering are eliminated, and a perfect, eternal kingdom is established.

The resurrection, therefore, is not merely a historical event but a living reality that shapes the present and defines the future of those who place their faith in Jesus Christ. It is the ultimate promise of hope, salvation, and eternal life.

Challenges to the Resurrection Narrative

The story of Jesus’ resurrection, while central to Christian faith, faces scrutiny and questioning from various perspectives. Understanding these challenges is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the historical and theological claims surrounding Easter Sunday. This section delves into the most common arguments that cast doubt on the resurrection, examining alternative explanations and comparing differing viewpoints on the accuracy of the accounts.

Common Arguments Questioning the Resurrection

Skeptics and critics of the resurrection narrative often present a variety of arguments. These arguments aim to provide alternative explanations for the events surrounding Jesus’ death and the subsequent claims of resurrection.

• The Swoon Theory: This theory suggests that Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely lost consciousness. After being taken down, he revived in the tomb and later appeared to his disciples. This theory posits that the disciples, mistaking his weakened state for a resurrected being, misinterpreted his reappearance.
• The Conspiracy Theory: This argument proposes that the disciples, or possibly others, fabricated the story of the resurrection. The aim was to establish a new religious movement by claiming Jesus had conquered death and would return.
• The Hallucination Theory: This theory attributes the resurrection appearances to hallucinations experienced by the disciples. Grief, religious fervor, and psychological factors are cited as potential causes for these visions.
• The Wrong Tomb Theory: This theory suggests that the disciples went to the wrong tomb, and thus, they didn’t find the body of Jesus. This mistake, coupled with grief and expectation, could have led to the belief in a resurrection.
• Naturalistic Explanations: These explanations seek to account for the resurrection claims without appealing to supernatural events. This may involve downplaying the historical accuracy of the Gospel accounts, suggesting that they were embellished over time.

Overview of Alternative Theories

Several alternative theories have been proposed to explain the events of Easter Sunday, each attempting to provide a more naturalistic or less miraculous explanation for the empty tomb and the appearances of Jesus.

• The Burial in a Common Grave Theory: This theory suggests that Jesus was buried in a common grave, and his body was either scavenged by animals or otherwise disposed of.
• The Theft of the Body Theory: This theory argues that someone, possibly the Romans, the Jewish authorities, or even the disciples, removed Jesus’ body from the tomb. The motivation for this could have been to prevent veneration or to promote the disciples’ agenda.
• The Mythological Interpretation: This perspective treats the resurrection narrative as a symbolic story or myth, not a literal historical event. It sees the story as reflecting archetypal themes of death and rebirth, rather than a specific event.
• The Spiritual Resurrection Theory: This view suggests that the resurrection was a spiritual, rather than a physical, event. Jesus’ spirit lived on, but his physical body remained in the tomb.

Comparison of Viewpoints on Historical Accuracy

Different viewpoints on the historical accuracy of the resurrection accounts range from accepting them as literal historical events to dismissing them as largely fictional or embellished. The assessment of historical accuracy often hinges on the reliability of the sources, the consistency of the accounts, and the plausibility of supernatural events.

• Conservative Christian View: This viewpoint generally accepts the Gospel accounts as historically accurate, believing that the resurrection was a literal, physical event. The empty tomb, the appearances of Jesus, and the transformation of the disciples are seen as evidence of the resurrection.
• Liberal Christian View: Some liberal Christians may interpret the resurrection symbolically, focusing on its theological significance rather than its literal historicity. They may believe in a spiritual resurrection or emphasize the importance of Jesus’ teachings and example.
• Skeptical View: Skeptics and critics of the resurrection often question the historical accuracy of the accounts, citing inconsistencies, potential biases in the sources, and the lack of independent corroboration. They may propose alternative explanations for the events.
• Historical-Critical View: This approach employs historical and literary analysis to evaluate the Gospel accounts. It seeks to determine the historical kernel of truth within the narratives, separating fact from embellishment or theological interpretation.

Critical Viewpoint and Rebuttal

A common critical viewpoint often focuses on the lack of conclusive evidence to support the resurrection. For example, some historians argue that the Gospels were written decades after the events, potentially introducing biases and inaccuracies.

“The resurrection story is based on accounts written many years after the supposed events, making it impossible to verify the claims. The lack of contemporary documentation and the presence of inconsistencies between the Gospels undermine the narrative’s historical credibility.”

This argument is often countered by:

While the Gospels were written some time after the events, they are based on earlier oral traditions and eyewitness accounts. The early dating of Paul’s letters, which mention the resurrection, also provides independent confirmation. Inconsistencies can be attributed to different perspectives and theological emphases, not necessarily to deliberate fabrication. Furthermore, the transformation of the disciples and the rapid spread of Christianity are difficult to explain without some extraordinary event.

The Date of Easter Sunday

The date of Easter Sunday is not fixed, unlike many other Christian holidays. Instead, it’s determined by a complex calculation rooted in both astronomical and historical factors. This section delves into the methods, lunar connections, historical context, and liturgical variations that shape the observance of Easter.

Methods for Determining the Date of Easter Sunday

The determination of Easter Sunday’s date is a fascinating blend of ancient practices and astronomical observations. It follows the guidelines established by the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, aiming to align the celebration with the Jewish Passover tradition while also considering the lunar cycle.The primary method used is based on the following principles:* Easter Sunday falls on the first Sunday following the first ecclesiastical full moon that occurs on or after the spring equinox.

• The spring equinox is generally fixed as March 21st.
• The ecclesiastical full moon is calculated using a 19-year cycle, known as the Metonic cycle, which approximates the lunar cycle.

The calculations involve complex algorithms and are often based on the Gregorian calendar. This ensures that Easter falls within the range of March 22nd and April 25th each year.

Relationship Between the Lunar Calendar and the Celebration of Easter

The lunar calendar plays a crucial role in determining the date of Easter. The celebration is tied to the vernal equinox and the first full moon following it, reflecting the historical connection to the Jewish Passover.The importance of the lunar cycle stems from the following points:* The Jewish Passover, the historical context for the Last Supper and Jesus’ crucifixion, is determined by the lunar calendar.

• The early Christians, many of whom were Jewish, initially celebrated Easter in conjunction with Passover.
• The Council of Nicaea sought to separate Easter from the Jewish Passover date while still acknowledging its lunar roots.
• The “ecclesiastical full moon” used in the Easter calculation is not the astronomical full moon, but a calculated approximation.

This complex interplay between the solar and lunar calendars ensures that Easter is always celebrated on a Sunday, allowing for consistent worship practices.

Historical Reasons for the Establishment of the Easter Date

The establishment of the date for Easter Sunday was a pivotal moment in the development of Christianity. The Council of Nicaea played a significant role in formalizing the celebration.The historical context for the Easter date includes:* The Council of Nicaea (325 AD): This council, convened by Emperor Constantine, established the date of Easter as the first Sunday following the first full moon after the spring equinox.

This decision aimed to create a unified celebration across the Christian world.

Separation from Jewish Passover

The Council sought to distance the Christian celebration from the Jewish Passover, which was often celebrated on different dates by different Christian communities. This was a step toward establishing a distinct Christian identity.

Theological Significance

The date was chosen to align with the belief that Jesus rose from the dead on a Sunday, emphasizing the importance of the resurrection.

Liturgical Unity

Establishing a consistent date for Easter facilitated liturgical unity and allowed for synchronized celebrations across different regions.These historical events highlight the significance of Easter and its central role in the Christian faith.

Liturgical Traditions and Their Relation to Easter

Different liturgical traditions observe Easter with unique practices and dates, although all share the same core belief in the resurrection of Jesus. The differences stem from historical and cultural influences.Here’s a list of different liturgical traditions and their relation to Easter:* Western Christianity (Catholic and Protestant): They follow the Gregorian calendar, resulting in Easter Sunday being celebrated on a date between March 22nd and April 25th.

Liturgical practices often include sunrise services, special church services, and the observance of Holy Week leading up to Easter.

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

They generally use the Julian calendar to calculate the date of Easter. This often results in Easter being celebrated later than in Western Christianity. The calculation is also based on the vernal equinox and the full moon.

Coptic Orthodox Church and other Oriental Orthodox Churches

These churches have their own calendar systems. Easter is often celebrated on a date different from both Western and Eastern Orthodox traditions.

Variations within Protestantism

While all Protestants generally follow the Western date for Easter, specific denominations may have their own unique liturgical practices. Some churches may emphasize specific aspects of the resurrection story.The variations demonstrate the diversity within Christianity while emphasizing the unifying belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Epilogue: Did Jesus Rise From The Dead On Easter Sunday

So, did Jesus rise from the dead on Easter Sunday? That’s the million-dollar question, right? We’ve seen the evidence, heard the arguments, and wrestled with the interpretations. Whether you’re a believer, a skeptic, or just plain curious, the story of the resurrection remains a powerful force. It’s a tale of hope, redemption, and the enduring power of belief.

No matter what you believe, the impact of Easter Sunday on the world is undeniable. So, go forth, contemplate, and maybe even grab a chocolate bunny – you’ve earned it!

Question & Answer Hub

What’s the deal with the empty tomb?

The empty tomb is the OG mystery! It’s a key piece of evidence, as the Gospels say the tomb where Jesus was buried was found empty on Easter Sunday. This sparked the belief that he had risen.

Why is Easter Sunday’s date so weird?

Easter’s date is based on the lunar calendar, which means it shifts around. It’s tied to the spring equinox and the first full moon after that. This makes the date change every year.

Who were the first witnesses to the resurrection?

The Gospels mention various witnesses, including Mary Magdalene, other women, and the disciples. They saw the risen Jesus and were the first to spread the news.

What are some common arguments against the resurrection?

Some argue the body was stolen, that Jesus didn’t actually die, or that the disciples hallucinated. These arguments are often countered by historical and textual analysis.

Why is the resurrection important to Christians?

The resurrection is the cornerstone of Christian faith. It signifies victory over death, offers hope for eternal life, and proves Jesus is the Son of God. It’s kinda a big deal.